Look for plus Sebesta 1994a: 51n14; Palmer 1989 : 41n177
153 The look of the students Roman Woman 37 Lucan 2.363–364: . umerisque haerentia primis / suppara nudatos cingunt angusta lacertos. (The fresh new apparel is probably labeled regarding plural here to have causes from scansion.) 38 Into the strophium, come across Olson 2003: 203–5; Leary 1996: 198–9; Goldman 1994b: 233–5; cf. Richlin 1997, an appealing account of your medicinal uses of your own lady individual looks, however a merchant account away from Roman clothing or lingerie. 39 Ter. Eun. 313–317: haud similis virgost virginum nostrarum, quas matres student / demissis umeris esse, vincto pectore, ut gracilae sient. / si qua est habitior paulo, pugilem esse aiunt, deducunt cibum: / tam etsi bonast natura, reddunt curatura iunceam: / itaque therefore amantur. forty Look for Olson 2003: 204, which have sources. 41 Prop. 4.–34: mox, ubi iam facibus cessit praetexta maritis, / vinxit ainsi que acceptas altera vitta comas . chatted about of the Edmondson, chap. 1, contained in this frequency. 42 Val. Flac. 8.6: ultima virgineis tunc flens dedit oscula vittis. 43 Nonius 353 L = 236 Yards: minoris natu capite aperto erant, capillo pexo, vittis innexis crinibus. To get more detailed dialogue on the vittae, get a hold of Fantham, chap. 7, in this volume. forty-two Into the bulla, pick Gabelmann 1985: 520–step 1, 523; Goette 1986; Palmer 1989 . This may have stored ‘cures’ (remedia), prior to titled ‘provisions’ (praebia), but these will never be explicitly discussed: pick Macr. Sat. step 1.6.9; Palmer 1989 : 20–21. Sons away from freedmen and you can slaves was in fact forbidden to put on it (Palmer 1989 : fifteen, 69). Tarquinius Priscus is said to possess already been the first to ever expose his son that have a beneficial bulla, as the an effective token out of bravery, given that guy had killed a challenger from inside the battle whenever nevertheless of a get older to wear the fresh bordered robe (Pliny HN ). Really bullae were made from silver (Festus thirty-two L = thirty six Yards), but Calpurnius Siculus (Ecl. 6.41) speaks out-of mug bullae (vitreas … bullas). Quaest. Rom 101 = Mor. 288a, proclaiming that the new bulla is donned by guys even though its most other signs and symptoms of score was left-off. forty five Plaut. Epid. 639–640: low meministi me personally auream offer te afferre natali die lunulam atque anellum aureolum when you look at the digitum? 46 Isid. Etym. : lunulae sunt ornamenta mulierum in lunae similtudinem, bullulae aureae dependentes. Inside passageway mulierum cannot indicate ‘women’s,’ but merely ‘female.’ Ulpian (given that excerpted in the Break down 34.2.25.9) states: ‘a history off women gowns boasts baby clothing, lady children’s clothing, and you will younger girls’ clothes; for all those of your ladies gender are classed given that women’ (muliebri veste legata ainsi que infantilem contineri ainsi que puellarum et virginum Pomponius libro vicesimo secundo advertising Sabinum recte scribit: mulieres enim omnes dici, quaecumque sexus feminini sunt). 47 Plaut. Rud. 1171: et bulla aurea 
est, pater quam dedit mi natali perish. This is basically the
The new locket, including the toga praetexta, signified new son wasn’t getting contacted by people for sexual purposes: get a hold of Plut
You’ll find nothing in the aesthetic evidence to indicate that girls wore the brand new bulla. Once the Goette points out (1986: 144), you to funerary save and that generally seems to reveal a girl putting on it amulet for the nearer test in reality depicts the woman for the a great necklace holding a spherical fruit to the lady boobs (ibid. A prospective Etruscan illustration of a woman for the a beneficial bulla (ibid. Goette 1990: 80–dos, 158–nine. Musei Capitolini, Rome, inv. With this sculpture-classification, and that probably plus to start with included a portrayal of your own dad, find George 2001. Towards the south frieze, Stone sees perhaps not a great toga however, an excellent palla draped once the a beneficial toga (1994: 41 and you can n39; cf. George 2001: 189n25). To have identifications regarding the profile, select Gabelmann 1985: 522–3; George 2001: 184–5; Gercke 1968: 130; Kleiner 1993: 33 (where she as well sees not a great toga however, an effective palla); Simon 1967: 19.